Criminal revision petition filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. regarding bank guarantee order was dismissed as withdrawn by the court on the submission that the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRL. R. P. NO. 100150 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI LAXMIKANT K GURAV, ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE SATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH KATKOL P.S, BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH AT DHARWAD, DHARWAD-580011.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI V. M. BANAKAR, ADDITIONAL S.P.P.)
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING THAT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRL. SESSIONS COURT, BELAGAVI IN CRL.MISC.NO.1134/2018 DATED 25.04.2018 BE SET ASIDE BY MODIFYING IN RESPECT OF BANK GUARANTEE ORDERED BY THE COURT BELOW BE RELAXED BY ALLOWING THE REVISION PETITION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the Revision Petition since the Revision Petition has become infructuous.
Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
hnm
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Kalloli Maruti Kalsannavar
Shri Tukaram Hananth Haged
The State of Karnataka
Mohammad Nawaz
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
