The High Court of Karnataka rejected a criminal petition challenging an order granting maintenance. The court held that absent respondents and the lack of merits in the petitioner's case meant the lower order need not be interfered with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
Crl. P. No. 100974/2017
BETWEEN:
SUNILKUMAR B. S/O BHOGASHETTY, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC.: DRIVER, R/O HOUSE NO. 428/3, DEVAMBA AGRAHARA, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU, TQ & DIST: MYSURU.
(BY SRI PRUTHVI K.S. ADVOCATE)
AND:
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 125(1) OF CR.P.C. DATED 25.01.2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR VIDE ANNEXURE-E & ETC.
: 2 :
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING UP FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. However, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 is absent and no representation is made though the matter is set down for admission.
: 3 :
each of the petitioners. In the circumstances, it could be seen from the order that there is no dispute regarding the marital relationship.
: 4 :
SD JUDGE
bvv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the order enhancing maintenance under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. in the absence of respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunilkumar B. S/o Bhogashetty
Nihal D/o Sunilkumar Bhogashetty
Smt. Sudharani
N.K. Sudhindrarao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
