Petitioners requested withdrawal of their writ petitions with liberty to file fresh ones due to subsequent developments. The court accepted the request as a preliminary hearing matter.
Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions with liberty to form.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�
������������������������ ��������������������� ������������������������ ���!��������"��#���$����������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10th DAY OF MARCH 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION Nos.65146-65161 of 2010 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
�
������������������������ ��������������������� ������������������������ ���!��������"��#���$����������
KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY, PAVATE NAGAR, DHARWAD
�
������������������������ ��������������������� ������������������������ ���!��������"��#���$����������
�
������������������������ ��������������������� ������������������������ ���!��������"��#���$����������
PAVATE NAGAR, DHARWAD
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri. V G BHAT ADV.)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri.M.KUMAR, AGA FOR R1; Sri. PRAKASH S.UDEKERI, ADV. FOR R2.)
THESE WPs ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER DATED:08/06/2010 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, VIDE ANNEXURES-C, C1 TO C15.
�
������������������������ ��������������������� ������������������������ ���!��������"��#���$����������
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Mr.V.G.Bhat, Adv. for petitioners. Mr.M.Kumar, AGA for respondent No.1; Mr.Prakash S.Udekeri, Adv. for respondent No.2.
withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file fresh, in
view of the subsequent developments in the matter.
dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
Sd/JUDGE
RK/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions should be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MAHESH CHANNAPPA HUDDAR AND OTHERS
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF EDUCATION
KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY DHARWAD
VINEET KOTHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
