The High Court of Karnataka Entry (UGC) judge摇了摇头. dismissed a writ petition seeking terminal benefits, holding the petition abated as all legal heirs were deceased with no legal representatives left to continue the cause. SUBJECTS: pension, employment claims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�
������������������������ ������������������
����������� ��!���!�"
�#����$�����%���&��%%��������
'$�$��&(�"������"��)���*��#
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
WRIT PETITION No.62853 OF 2012 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
PARVATHI SUBRAY NAYAK AGE: 85 YRS, D/O SUBRAY NAYAK, OCC: NIL, TORKE VILLAGE-581344, TQ: KUMTA, DIST: U.K.
... PETITIONER
(By Sri. VEERESH R BUDIHAL ADV.)
AND:
�
������������������������ ������������������ ����������� ��!���!�" �#����$�����%���&��%%�������� '$�$��&(�"������"��)���*��#
BANGALORE 5600052
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri.M.KUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SMT.ARCHANA MAGADUM AND SRI.ANANDKUMAR A.MAGADUM FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS Nos.1 AND 2 HEREIN TO RELEASE THE 1/3rd OF THE TERMINAL BENEFITS OF HER DECEASED SON TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
�
������������������������ ������������������ ����������� ��!���!�" �#����$�����%���&��%%�������� '$�$��&(�"������"��)���*��#
O R D E R
Mr. Veeresh R Budihal Adv. for petitioner. Mr. M.Kumar, AGA for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mrs. Archana magadum and Mr. Anandkumar A.Magadum for respondent No.3.
that the petitioner-Smt.Parvathi W/o. Sri.Subray Nayak has expired on 16th January 2017 and there are no legal representatives left by petitioner to represent her cause in the present case. This was informed to the Court by the learned counsel for the respondent No.3, Smt.Archana Magadum, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Veeresh R.Budihal.
�
������������������������ ������������������ ����������� ��!���!�"
�#����$�����%���&��%%�������� '$�$��&(�"������"��)���*��#
getting the compensation of services rendered by him in the Cooperative Societies Department.
espouse her cause, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as having abated.
Sd/JUDGE
RK/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition claiming terminal benefits should be dismissed due to the death of the petitioner without legal representatives.
Parvathi Subray Nayak
The Principal Accountant General Karnataka
Registrar of Cooperative Societies
Sharada Nagesh Kavari
Vineet Kothari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
