Petitioner challenged orders under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The Court found the relief sought became infructuous, dismissing the petition on these grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2017
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 114801 of 2015 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Neelappagouda Bheemangouda Patil Age: 42 Years, Occupation: Agriculturist, Resident of Yattingudda Village, Tq & Dist: Dharwad.
... Petitioner
(By Sri. G.A.Holeyannavar, Advocate.)
And
Bheemangouda Neelappagouda Patil Agae: 74 Years, Occupation: Agriculturist, R/O: Yattingudda Village, Tq & Dist: Dharwad.
... Respondent
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 And 227 of The Constitution of India, 1950, praying to quash the orders dated:16.11.2015 on IA.No.5 in Os.No.617/2014, passed by the III Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Court, Dharwad and the copy of order produced at Annexure-A.
: 2 :
This petition coming on for Preliminary hearing, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief
sought for in this petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the
petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KS
Neelappagouda Bheemangouda Patil
Bheemangouda Neelappagouda Patil
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
