The High Court of Karnataka Bench at Dharwad disposed of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of orders dated 10.01.2000, holding that petitioners could pursue an appeal instead.
Disposed of with liberty to prefer appeal before appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY
WRIT PETITION NO.102802 OF 2016 (LR) AND
WRIT PETITIONS NO.110132-110134 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
... PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI SHIVASAI M PATIL, ADVOCATE)
2
AND
DISTRICT: HAVERI
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT K. VIDYAVATHI, AGA)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10.01.2000 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND C.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
In these petitions, the petitioners pray for a writ in the
nature of certiorari quashing the orders impugned dated 10th
January 2000 produced Annexure-B and C to these petitions.
3
Sd/JUDGE
lnn
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhimappa S/o Balappa Timmapur
Huligepa S/o Hanumanthappa Timmapur
Huligepa S/o Durgappa Timmapur
Nawax Khatanbi Javedji Abdul Rakha Biradar
Deputy Commissioner Haveri
Assistant Commissioner Savanur
L Narayana Swamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
