Shankareppa Kallappa Muragod v. Neelawwa @ Sarojini
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected the writ petition as infructuous because the impugned order of 11.10.2013 had been superseded by a subsequent order dated 04.01.2013 which was not challenged.
What did the court decide?
none
What the court decided
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF MARCH 2017
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
Writ Petition No.101718 of 2014(GM-CPC)
Between:
Shankareppa Kallappa Muragod Age: 53 Years, Occupation : Service Resident of Yaradal, Taluk : Bailhongal District : Belgaum
... Petitioner
(By Shri Prakash B. Angadi, Advocate)
And:
Neelawwa @ Sarojini Wife of Shankareppa Muragod Age: 50 Years, Occupation :Household Work Resident of Parishwad Village Taluk :Khanapur, District : Belgaum
... Respondent
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash or modify the order regarding recovery of alimony.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shankareppa Kallappa Muragod
- respondent
Neelawwa @ Sarojini
Coram
AND BYRAREDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/101718/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court