High Court at Dharwad Bench dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 CPC as withdrawn, after counsel stated parties had compromised in final decree proceedings.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
R.S.A. NO.5284/2013 (PARTITION AND MESNE PROFITS)
BETWEEN:
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. V G BHAT, ADVOCATE)
: 2 :
AND
: 3 :
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V P KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R3-R8) (ABATED AGAINST R-1) (R2 AND R9 NOTICE SERVED)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:29.02.2012, PASSED IN R.A.NO.204/2006, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUMTA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL, FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED:25.10.2004 AND THE DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.41/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) KUMTA, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND FOR MESNE PROFITS.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDER THIS DAY, THIS COURT, PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
: 4 :
Sd/JUDGE
yan
1 provisions across 1 enactments
U.F.M. VASANT DATTA DESHBHADARI and others
RAMACHANDRA LAXMAN DESHBHADARI and others
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
