of plaintiff No.1. These two plaintiffs filed a suit seeking declaration that they were having right to worship in Sri Kanavi Veerabhadra Swamy Temple and for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit property, i.e. temple. Their case is that the first plaintiff’s husband Chandraiah was the Archak of the temple and after his death, the second plaintiff has continued to be Archak, with the help of defendants No.3 and 4, who are son-in-law and grandson of first plaintiff respectively. From their own efforts, they developed the temple. According to the plaintiffs, the defendant No.1 is a trust, which came into existence on 11/10/1996. Plaintiff No.1 was made a member of the trust without her consent. The trust should not have formed. Therefore, according to the plaintiffs, the trust is illegal. The trust started interfering with the rights of the plaintiff to worship in the temple, and that defendant No.2 also filed a suit O.S.No.64/1998 for seeking relief of injunction. In that suit, the plaintiff was not made a party. Since the suit was concerned with the plaintiff’s right and that they were not made parties in that suit, they made application for impleading them in the suit. But that application was
