Mr Arvind Mediratta v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition in lieu of Section 168 CrPC, holding that based on Section 13(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the company must be prosecuted before individuals can be held vicariously liable, dismissing arguments distinguishing supervisory role demands.
What did the court decide?
No relief was granted to the petitioner. The petition in lieu of Section 168 CrPC was dismissed.