Sri Mohan Kumar M v. Sri Vipin Chandra
Case brief
What is this about?
Single paragraph order by Karnataka High Court rejecting a Petitioner's Criminal Writ Petition seeking restoration of a Section 138 complaint dismissed below for complainant's lack of diligence and repeated absence.
What did the court decide?
The petition for setting aside the impugned order and restoring the complaint is rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.533 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
Sri. Mohan Kumar M., Son of Muniraju M., Aged about 25 years, Residing at No.51/52, 4th Main, Jayanagara East Block, Byrasandra, Bengaluru – 560 011.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri Rajesh Rao K., Advocate)
AND:
Sri. Vipin Chandra, Son of D.M.Prasad, Major in age, Residing at D-No.27, Type 2, Block No.-5, Nimhans Quarters, Byrasandra,
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a criminal petition seeking restoration of a complaint dismissed for non-prosecution in a cheque dishonour case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan Kumar M.
- respondent
Vipin Chandra
Coram
Anand Byrareddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/533/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court