Sri.Birappa v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court permitted modification of bail conditions regarding a seized tipper. Petitioner agreed to deposit cash directly instead of furnishing a bank guarantee, satisfying the state's concern over asset recovery.
What did the court decide?
Condition No.7 modified to require deposit of Rs.1,00,000/- in Court with undertaking to forfeit vehicle and amount without notice on breach.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.200910/2017
Between:
Sri Birappa S/o Annappa Havaldar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o Halsangi, Tq. Indi, Dist. Vijaypur,
... Petitioner
(By Sri. S.S. Mamadapur, Advocate)
And:
The State of Karnataka Through Zalaki PS Rep. by its State Public Prosecutor, Advocate General’s Office High Court Building, Kalaburagi-585 107.
... Respondent
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition imposing a bank guarantee in criminal revision can be modified to direct the petition deposition of amount in court instead.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri Birappa S/o Annappa Havaldar
- respondent
The State of Karnataka Through Zalaki PS
Coram
B. A. Patil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/200910/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court