The High Court dismissed writ petitions (Nos. 35920-35921 of 2015) filed by Bommanna and Shankarappa, after the learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking to withdraw them.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos. 35920-35921 OF 2015 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
Both are residing at Yaladadlu Village 572 128, Kora Hobli, Tumkur Taluk and District.
…PETITIONERS
(By Shri V.B.Siddaramaiah, Advocate)
AND:
2
Principal Secretary to the Government.
…RESPONDENTS
(By Shri P.V.Chandrashekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3;
Shri Vijayakumar A Patil, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1)
These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the endorsement dated 16.5.2015 issued by the third respondent vide AnnexureM and etc;
These Writ Petitions coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
3
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo
seeking to withdraw the petitions.
The memo is placed on record and the petitions are
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
nv
Bommanna
Shankarappa
The State of Karnataka, Department of Industries and Commerce
Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board
Special LAO., KIADB
ANAND BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
