Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petitions filed for quashing complaints and FIRs. High Court recorded the withdrawal memo and dismissed the petitions.
Nothing granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos.11670-11675 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
H.V.Somashekar, Son of Late Venktappa, Age: 54 years, Harohalli, Kanakapura – 562 117. Ramanagara District.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri T.I.Abdulla, Advocate)
AND:
2
Vokkaligara Building, Hudson Circle, Bangalore – 560 002.
3
…RESPONDENTS
(By Smt. R. Anitha, Government Pleader)
These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash complaint vide Annexure-H, dated 10.12.2014, H1 dated 4.12.2014, H2 dated 26.12.2014, H3 dated 26.12.2014, H4 dated 23.12.2014 and H5 dated 31.1.2015 and also the FIR vide Annexure-J dated 10.12.2014, J-1 dated 4.12.2014, J-2 dated 26.12.2014, J3 dated 5.3.2015, J4 dated 23.12.2014 and J5 dated 31.1.2015 and etc;
4
These Writ Petitions coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking to withdraw the petition as not pressed.
The memo is taken on record and the petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE
KS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
H.V. Somashekar
State of Karnataka
ANAND BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
