Dismissed

Sayeda Areefa W/O S Mohammaed Yusuf, v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC16 Jun 2016WP/114816/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash pending Civil proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to make compliance by 30.06.2016, failing which the petition would be dismissed. Petitioner did not comply, leading to dismissal.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to comply with the court's order by 30.06.2016.

Sayeda Areefa W/O S Mohammaed Yusuf, Vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶2

DHARWAD BENCH

¶3

DATED THIS 16^Th DAY OF JUNE, 2016

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WP NO 114816 OF 2015 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SAYEDA AREEFA W/O S MOHAMMAED YUSUF, AGE: 28 YEARS, R/O: SAYYAD BASHU MANZIL, 8^TH CROSS, M.J. NAGAR, 28^TH WARD, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI.

¶8

... PETITIONER

¶9

(By Sri./Smt : K L PATIL, Adv.)

¶10

AND:

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶12

THE POLICE INSPECTOR, RURAL POLICE STATION, HOSPETE, PARVEZ COMPLEX, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI.

¶13

MOHAMMED YOUSUF S/O RAMAVALI @ VALIBHASHA AGE: YEARS, R/O: RAILWAY QUARTERS A.N.GUDI, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI.

¶14

¶15

RAMAVALI @ VALIBHASHA, AGE: YEARS, R/O: RAILWAY QUARTERS A.N.GUDI, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI.

¶16

GOUSIA BEGAUM, AGE: YEARS, R/O: RAILWAY QUARTERS A.N.GUDI, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI.

¶17

SALIMA, AGE: YEARS, R/O: RAILWAY QUARTERS A.N.GUDI, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI.

¶18

... RESPONDENTS

¶19

¶20

This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India R/W Sec. 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to quash the proceedings pending on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC Sandur in P.C. No. 51/2010 at Annexure G and also to quash the E-Auction to be held on 18.02.2012 at vide Annexure H in so pas as these petitioners are concerned as per Annexure H.

¶21

This Petition coming on for orders on this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

“Learned advocate seeks time.

¶24

Compliance if not made before 30.06.2016, the petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without reference to Bench.”

¶25

SD/JUDGE.

¶26

¶27

Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated: 15.07.2016, the Advocate for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No. 114816/2015 stands dismissed as per the Court Order dated 16.06.2016.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶30

T By: nd R By: C By:

Sayeda Areefa W/O S Mohammaed Yusuf, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayeda Areefa W/O S Mohammaed Yusuf, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Ramu Vs Sri Dhanpal

Nagappa Adopted S/O. Fakkirappa Sunkad Vs Mahadevi W/O. Channapasappa Navalgund

Shri.Rudragouda Vs Smt.Ratnavva

Mustafa S/O Sajadsab Kavalur Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Suresh S/O. Shankar Patil Vs the Superintendent of Polce

Raghavendra S/O Premanathsa Kathare, Vs Lakshmi @ Bharati W/O Raghavendra Kathare