This judgment dismisses a second writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act for non-prosecution due to repeated non-compliance with office objections. The appellate court did not address the substantive issue.
The writ appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
WRIT APPEAL NO.200307/2015 (KLR-RR-SUR)
BETWEEN:
�
Occupation: Agriculture,
All are Residents of Hiredinni Village, Taluk: Manvi, District: Raichur
… APPELLANTS
(Shri Chitanyakumar Chandriki & Shri Manjunath Mallayya Shetty, Advocates)
AND:
�
All are Residents of Hiredinni Village, Taluk: Manvi, District: Raichur – 584 101.
… RESPONDENTS
This Writ Appeal is filed Under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to allow the writ appeal and consequently be pleased to set aside the judgment dated 25.03.2015 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.11990/2007.
������������������������������������������� ����� ��������������������������������������
�
JUDGMENT
Since there is non-compliance of office objections for the
fifth time, there is no warrant to grant any further time.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
sdu
Sharanappa S/o Sannabasanna & Others
The State of Karnataka & Others
ANAND BYRAREDDY
RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
