The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a regular second appeal under Section 100 of CPC for non-prosecution, as the appellant's counsel remained absent and no steps were taken to comply with objections.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200123/2015
BETWEEN:
Yenkanna S/o Bhimappa Surpur Age about 75 years, Occupation: Nil, Resident of Brichkithkkeri Valmiki Chowk Near Gopal Swami Temple Shorapur, Taluk: Shorapur, District: Yadgiri – 585 201. (Shri V.S. Patil, Advocate - Absent)
… APPELLANT
AND:
2
Taluk: Shorapur, District: Yadgiri – 585 201.
… RESPONDENTS
This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code��1908, against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.08.2014 passed in R.A.No.30/2013 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge Shorapur, sitting at Shahapur, dismissing the appeal and confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 02.08.2013 passed in Original Suit No.97/2007 on the file of the Civil Judge and J.M.F.C. at Shahapur.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
Inspite of several adjournments, the appellant has failed
to take any steps to comply with the office objections. Even today, the learned Counsel remains absent. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
���� �����
swk
Yenkanna S/o Bhimappa Surpur
Nagappa S/o Venkatappa
Ningappa S/o Venkatappa
Durgavva W/o Venkatappa
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
