Review petition filed in Regular Second Appeal for non-prosecution was dismissed. The petitioner appeared absent and the grounds for review were found untenable.
Dismissed the review petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
REVIEW PETITION NO.2528 OF 2012 IN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL 656/2005
BETWEEN:
Smt. Meerabai W/o Balaram Aged 44 years, Occupation: Household And Agriculture, Resident of Aurad (B) Now at Batgera (B), Taluka Sedam, District Gulbarga – 585 222.
… PETITIONER
(Shri N. Krishnacharya, Advocate-Absent)
AND:
2
… RESPONDENTS
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to review the judgment dated 23.03.2010 passed by this Court in Regular Second Appeal No.656/2005.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner. The ground for review is
also not tenable. In any event, the petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
swk
Smt. Meerabai W/o Balaram
Gundusingh S/o Ramkishan
Smt. Jamanabai W/o Ramkishan
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
