Disposed

Vinod Kumar S/O Bakkaiah Hiremath v. Baswaraj S/O Bhimanna Karpoor and Another

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2016MFA/200906/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Lok Adalat proceedings, parties settled a Motor Accident Claimant's appeal. The Insurance Company agreed to pay an additional Rs. 1,20,000 to the appellant in full settlement, which the Tribunal ordered to be deposited with penalty interest if overdue.

What did the court decide?

Additional compensation of Rs. 1,20,000 awarded in full and final settlement; award modified accordingly.

Vinod Kumar S/O Bakkaiah Hiremath Vs Baswaraj S/O… — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, KALABURAGI

¶3

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT KALABURAGI

¶5

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016

¶6

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶7

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.

¶8

AND

¶9

SRI M.A.QUAYUM, MEMBER

¶10

M.F.A. NO.200906/2015 (MV)

¶11

(LOK ADALAT NO.710/2016)

¶12

BETWEEN:

¶13

VINODKUMAR S/O BAKKAIAH HIREMATH AGE: 25 YEAR OCC: OPERATOR (WORKSHOP) R/O CHARAKPALLI TQ. ZAIRABAD DIST. MEDAK-AP

¶14

...APPELLANT

¶15

(BY SRI SHARANABASSAPPA K. BABSHETTY, ADV.)

¶16

AND:

¶17

BASAWARAJ S/O BHIMANNA KARPOOR AGE: MAJOR

¶18

¶19

OCC: OWNER OF LORRY R/O H.NO.13/1/178, LADGERI HALADKERI TQ. AND DIST. BIDAR- 585 401

¶20

THE FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER 2^ND FLOOR KALABURAGI LANDMARK OPPOSITE TB GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL DESHPANDE NAGAR HUBLI-K.S.-58 6105

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI SUDARSHAN M., ADV. FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED: 31.08.15)

¶23

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 7.3.2015 PASSED BY ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM & ADDL. MACT AT BIDAR, IN MVC NO. 518/2013 AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT AS CLAIMED BY THE APPELLANT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶24

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION THIS DAY, BUDIHAL R.B. J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

¶25

¶26

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶27

The learned counsel for the appellant and the representative of the Respondent No.2-Insurance

¶28

Company along with its counsel are present.

¶29

This is a claimant’s appeal as against the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. By mutual consent of the parties, it is agreed for a lump sum of Rs.1,20,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Thousand only) in addition to the amount awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect.

¶30

Respondent No.2 – Insurance Company shall

¶31

deposit the said amount before the Tribunal, within Six weeks from the date of preparation of Award, failing which

¶32

¶33

the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a.. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶34

The entire amount is ordered to be released in

¶35

favour of the appellant-claimant.

¶36

This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the joint memo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly.

¶37

Sd/JUDGE

¶38

Sd/MEMBER

¶39

SDU CT-SI

Vinod Kumar S/O Bakkaiah Hiremath v. Baswaraj S/O Bhimanna Karpoor and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar S/O Bakkaiah Hiremath v. Baswaraj S/O Bhimanna Karpoor and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baban S/O Bapu Shinde Vs Deepa Vipul Thakkar and Anr.

Basavaraj S/O Malleshgouda Bharamshetty, Vs M Udaykumar S/O R.Marappan and Anr.

Basappa S/O Shivappa Pawar Vs Ganeshwar S/O Bhagavantha Gayakwad

Sri. Shivappa S/O Basappa Mudashi Vs Sri. Narasinh and Ors.

Syed Shalam S/O. Syed Maheboob and Ors. Vs Syed Gulzar Hussain S/O. Syed Abbas Hussai and Ors.

Sri.Tanaji S/O Ramu Chavan and Anr. Vs Shri.Vishwas S/O Namadev Masal and Anr.