Allowed
Sri.Jeevaraj Puranik v. State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCCRL.P/4125/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Complaints concerned failure to refund public deposits collected by a company. The court allowed the petitions, directing that subsequent complaints be treated as witness statements in the main case and tried together. Future police and private complaints arising from the same circumstances were to receive the same treatment.
What did the court decide?
C.C.No.8/2015 designated the main case; subsequent complaints to be treated as witness statements and tried as one case, with the same treatment for future complaints arising from the same circumstanc