Criminal petition seeking quashing of FIR under CrPC Sec 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-compliance with office objections notwithstanding opportunities provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3018 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
Mudassir, Son of Late Abdul Rasheed, Aged about 30 years, Bachelor of Architecture, Residing at No.65/2B. 10th Cross, Rajendra Nagar, Kesare, Mysore – 570 007.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri A.S.Kulkarni, Advocate [absent] )
AND:
2
Mysore – 570 007.
…RESPONDENTS
(By Shri Chetan Desai, Government Pleader for Respondent Mp/1/State)
This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the FIR registered against the petitioner/accused No.1 in the Narasimharaja Police Station, Crime No.358/2014 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 3(1)(b)(c), 4(1)(a) of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Supply and Control Order 2000 and Section 3 and 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 on the file of the learned III Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mysore.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders on Office Objections this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
In spite of several opportunities granted to the petitioner
to comply with the office objections, there is non-compliance.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KS
Mudassir
The State of Karnataka
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
