Maria Joseph @ Joseph v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Sept 2016CRL.A/188/2012

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Maria Joseph @ Joseph Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶89

+��0+/6-+<�0�16��46,,++6-�61�5)0�4�,0��-��A.��.,�;�� 5.50�61��5�=.+�6<+0�;02�5).5�5)0�1.45�5).5�5)0�.443+02� .�6-0�=.+�=5)�)+�=10�-�5)0�)63+0�=)0-�+)0�=.+� ,3�20�02�5)0�0�=5)�BA)3A)�C�.-2�5)0�1.45�5).5�5)0� �0�.56-+�61�5)0�.443+02�=5)�)0��=0�0�+5�.-02�=63�2$�-�5)0� .<+0-40�61�.-9�46:0-5�0E/�.-.56-�<9�),$�/6-5�56�)+�:3�5�� -��.-0+)�.��;��5.50�61��.).�.+)5�.�5)0�.//0��.-5�=.+� /�6+043502�16��5)0�,3�20��61�)+�=10�=)4)�566A�/�.40� -+20�)+�)63+0��5�=.+�6<+0�;02�5).5�=)0-�5)0�20.5)�).2� 6443��02�-�)+�43+5629$�5)0�.//0��.-5�+�3-20��.-�6<�:.56-� 56�:;0�.�/�.3+<�0�0E/�.-.56-�16��5)0�4.3+0�61�)0��20.5)�-� )+�+5.50,0-5�3-20��0456-�7�7��)0�,0�0�20-.��61� 5)0� /�6+04356-� 4.+0� 463/�02� =5)� .<+0-40� 61� .-9� 0E/�.-.56-�=.+�)0�2�56�<0�-46-++50-5�=5)�5)0�--640-40� 61�5)0�.443+02$�<35�46-++50-5�=5)�5)0�)9/65)0++�5).5�5)0� .//0��.-5�+�.�/�,0�.443+02�-�5)0�46,,++6-�61�,3�20��61� )+�=10��-��5.50�61��;��.;-2�.��.A.+)��55.��5)0� ,024.�� 0;20-40� 2+4�6+02� 5).5� 5)0� =10� 202� 61� +5�.-:3�.56-�23�-:��.50�-:)5�)63�+�6��0.��9�,6�--:�.-2� )0��<629�=.+�+05�6-�1*�0�.150��+/�-A�-:�A0�6+0-0��)0� 2010-40�61�5)0�)3+<.-2�=.+�5).5�5)0�=10�).2�46,,5502� +3420�<9�<3�--:�)0�+0�1�.-2�5).5�)0�=.+�-65�.5�)6,0�.5� 5).5�5,0��)0��0550�+�=�550-�<9�5)0�=10�56�)0��0�.5;0+� +)6=02�5).5�5)0�)3+<.-2���5�0.502�)0��.-2�5)0*��0�.56-+� =0�0�+5�.-02�.-2�13�5)0��5)0�0;20-40�+)6=02�5).5�<65)�61� 5)0,�=0�0�-�6-0��66,�-�5)0�-:)5��5�=.+�)0�2�5).5�5)0� 4).-�61�4�43,+5.-40+�=.+�46,/�050�.-2�5�=.+�5)0� )3+<.-2�=)6�46,,5502�5)0�,3�20��61�)+�=10�<9� +5�.-:3�.56-�.-2�.446�2-:�9�5)+��63�5��0;0�+02�5)0� >32:,0-5�61�5)0��:)��63�5�.4F355-:�5)0�.443+02�.-2� 46-;4502�),�3-20��0456-�7��-��5.50�61��;�� .>0-2�.-�5)0�=10�=.+�163-2�20.2�-�.�)35�=)4)�).2� 4.3:)5�1�0��)0�0;20-40�+)6=02�5).5�5)0�.443+02�.-2�)+� =10�=0�0�+00-�56:05)0��-�5)0�)35�.5�.<635�H��/�,��.-2� 5)0�.443+02�4.,0�635�-�5)0�,6�--:�5)�63:)�5)0��661�=)0-� 5)0�)35�).2�4.3:)5�1�0��+�0E/�.-.56-�=.+�5).5�5�=.+�.� 4.+0�61�.4420-5.��1*�0�=)4)��0+3�502�-�5)0�20.5)�61�)+�=10� .-2�.�2.3:)50��)0�,024.��0;20-40�+)6=02�5).5�5)0�=10� 202�230�56�.+/)9E.�.+�.��0+3�5�61�+5�.-:3�.56-�.-2�-65�6-� .4463-5�61�<3�-�*->3�*0+��5�=.+�)0�2�5).5�5)0�0�4.--65�<0�

Maria Joseph @ Joseph v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

The Land Acquisition Officer Vs Sri Puttamadappa

Babu @ Vishwanatha Vs the State of Karntaka

Sri Rajkumar Chhajer Vs Sri Kumar Naik

Sudeep Vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

Maria Joseph @ Joseph v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

The Land Acquisition Officer Vs Sri Puttamadappa

Babu @ Vishwanatha Vs the State of Karntaka

Sri Rajkumar Chhajer Vs Sri Kumar Naik

Sudeep Vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

Sri Shamshuddin Vs Sri Haris M.Y

Sri. S G Ramachandra Vs Savithri