Contempt court held the complaint was defective. The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The limitation question was left open.
The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn upon permission for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
CCC Nos. 200006-200009 OF 2016 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
2
… COMPLAINANTS
(Shri Vilaskumar Marthand Rao, Advocate)
AND:
Sri Abir Kumar Biswas HR Manager, ALSTOM Projects India Limited, P.O. Shahabad – 585 229, District Kalaburagi (Karnataka)
… ACCUSED
(Shri K. Sridhavan, Senior Counsel, & Shri Ashok S. Kinagi, Advocates)
These CCC’s are filed under Section 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, praying to initiate Contempt proceedings against the Accused for violating the order of Hon’ble Court passed in WP No.86335 to 86338/2012 dated 07.01.2015 which is at
3
Annexure ‘A’ and order for taking action as deemed fit including punishing the accused with imprisonment.
These CCC’s coming on for Orders this day, Anand Byrareddy J., made the following:
O R D E R
Since the complaint is found to be defective, the complainant is permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh complaint. Hence, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.
The question whether the complaint would be barred by limitation notwithstanding the judgment of the Division Bench in W.A.Nos.200017-200020 of 2015 dated 18.11.2015, is a question
that is left open.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KS
Sidram S/o Ramchandra
Syed Mohsin S/o Syed Mubeen
Nagendra S/o Ramlingappa Maka
Sajeev Kumar S/o Ambanna Nandurkar
Abir Kumar Biswas
Anand Byrareddy
Raghvendra S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
