Parusharam Basavantappa Bannigidad v. Karnataka University
Karnataka HCWP/62927/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The judgment text provided contains extensive text that appears to be corrupt, unreadable, or replaced by non-text characters, making it impossible to extract judges, parties, legal provisions, or the decision.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
: 1 :
¶2
������������������������������
¶3
�������������
¶4
������������������ ��������������������
¶5
������
¶6
�����������������������������������������
¶7
��� �!" � �#$��#��%�&��'���&�(�)���*
¶8
�" +""$,
¶9
!-�./0-�-1��-/-2-$ -33-��-$$�4�5-5 �4"�-6#. �7��8"-�/���99.3- �#$�,��"�2�9" �"/�5�$4�� ��)�:��� -;;�<.-� "�/� �.=6-�4-��$�2"�/� 8���.=6-�4-)�>���%�
¶10
����!" � �#$"�
¶11
(�8�����,��-$?-8��0-$-=���52#9- "*
¶12
�$5�,
¶13
- �-�$- -@��$�2"�/� 8 �0-�+-5�A��>����7
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/62927/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court