Writ petition regarding land acquisition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or comply with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 07th DAY OF JANUARY 2014
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.30860 OF 2013 (LA-KIADB)
BETWEEN:
Sri. Munianjanappa, Son of Narayanappa, Aged about 59 years, Residing at No.156, Bandikodigenahalli, Bangalore North Taluk. …PETITIONER
(By Shri. C. Vijaya Kumar, Advocate [absent] )
AND:
2
Bangalore – 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the Acquisition in respect of petitioner land Sy.No.40/P 360 measuring 2 acres situated at Bandikodigehalli Village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, in pursuance of the preliminary and final notifications dated 4.11.2006 and dated 10.5.2007 respectively vide Annexure-H and J.
This Writ Petition coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
3
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner. Inspite of time having
been granted, there is non-compliance of the office objections.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
nv
Munianjanappa
State of Karnataka
Special Land Acquisition Officer
Itasca Software Development Private Limited
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
