The single judge dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as counsel for all parties were absent despite a report of out-of-court settlement.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 22806 OF 2012 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
The School Development and Management Committee Government Primary School, Represented by President Smt.Shanthamma, Wife of Munikenchappa, Aged about 45 years, Resident of Pattandur Agrahara Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri. B.N. Puttalingaiah, Advocate [absent] )
AND:
2
…RESPONDENTS
(By Shri. H.S.Ramamurthy, Advocate)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District to dispose of the I.A.No.I under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 and Miscellaneous Appeal No.49/12 vide Annexure-L and issue writ.
This Writ Petition is coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
Though it has been reported that the matter has been
settled out of court, the counsel for the parties have remained
absent. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
The School Development and Management Committee Government Primary School, Represented by President Smt.Shanthamma
Sri. P.A.Krishnamurthy
Sri. N.Pillappa
ANAND BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
