Petitioners sought to quash an order via Writ Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn upon the filing of a withdrawal memo by the petitioners' counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2014
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos. 1980-1982 of 2014 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(By Shri. G.B. Sharath Gowda, Advocate )
AND:
2
Department of Public Instruction, Government of Karnataka, Nrupatunga Road, Bangalore – 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(By Shir. B. Veerappa, Additional Government Advocate )
These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 11.11.2013 passed in Appeal No.25(A)/2011 on the file of the fourth respondent at Annexure-C and etc;
These Writ Petitions coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
3
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking to withdraw the petitions
The memo is placed on record and the petitions are
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
nv
BEL Educational Institutions Management Committee
Sri. M.R. Hegde
The Director, (Secondary Education)
The Deputy Director (Administration)
The Block Education Officer
Commissioner of Public Instructions
ANDANT BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
