Dismissed
K. Mahadeva v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/1408/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL, 2014
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 1408 of 2013 (EDN-GIA)
BETWEEN:
K. Mahadeva, Son of Kala Lingappa, Aged about 52 years, Resident of Kirgavalu, Malavalli Taluk, Mandya District – 571 401.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri. D.S. Hosmath, Advocate)
AND:
2
… RESPONDENTS
(By Shri. B. Veerappa, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Shri. M.S. Parthasarathi, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare the order vide Annexure-D dated 18.12.2012 so far it relates to nonapplication of grant in favour of petitioner and declare that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of grant instead of respondent no.4 or 5.
3
This Writ Petition is coming on for Hearing this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to file a so-called comprehensive petition, if permissible
under law.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled for the benefit of grant instead of respondent no. 4 or 5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Mahadeva
The State of Karnataka
The Commissioner for Education
Chaitra Education Society
P. Siddappa Swamy
J. Bhagyamma
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court