A writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as infructuous after the main matter was disposed of by the Trial Court.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA GULBARGA BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN .M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO.102443 OF 2013 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Mohammed Haneef, since Deceased by L.Rs.
(By Sri Deepak V. Barad for Sri Veeresh B. Patil, Advocates)
2
AND:
Amanulla Khan S/o Subhan Khan, Age: 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Bhendi Bazaar, Shahapur, Tq. Chittapur, Dist: Gulbarga – 585 103.
... Respondent
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari, whereby quashing the impugned order dated 18.06.2013 passed in R.A.No.57/2011 by the lower appellate court as at Annexure-F to the writ petition by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at Chittapur and etc.,
This Writ Petition coming on for further orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the main matter itself is disposed of by the Trial Court.
The said submission is noted. Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
swk
Mohammed Haneef, since Deceased by L.Rs. (Mohd. Shafi, Mohd. Rafiq)
Amanulla Khan
Mohan .M. Shantanagoudar
swk
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
