The General Manager v. Syed Tabraz
Case brief
What is this about?
In this miscellaneous first appeal under Section 173(1) of the MV Act, the High Court of Karnataka noted that certain respondents were not served. The court permitted withdrawal of a portion of the deposited amount by Respondent No.1 but ultimately dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance of office objections.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No.1 permitted to withdraw Rs.40,000; Appeal dismissed due to non-compliance of office objections.