Manchangada Kiran @ Kariyappa v. State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCCRL.P/176/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Judgment text is unintelligible due to severe character corruption and missing the substantive legal discussion, facts, or decision.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
��������������������������������������������
¶2
������������������� ��������������������
¶3
�������
¶4
������������������������������������
¶5
�����������������������������
¶6
��� ���!�
¶7
�"#$%"#&"'"��()"#�*��")(+",,"� �&-'��.�+-")/� �0#�01��"'"("%� �232&0'2�4(33"&-� �"3-3-5��0'"&2��(/6)($6�7�8������
¶8
�����-6(6(0#-)�
¶9
9�+��)(������)--,)"/"'5��':�5;�
¶10
���!��
¶11
�6"6-�01��")#"6"<"�=+��0##">,-6� �03($-��6"6(0#� �0'"&2��(/6)($6�7�8��������
¶12
?��-/,0#'-#6�
¶13
9�+��)(����"&-/%@")",,"5�����;�
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/176/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court