This order allowed an application condoning a three-day delay in filing a petition under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for reasons stated in the application.
The delay in filing the petition is condoned and the subsequent petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
COMPANY APPLICATION No. 142 OF 2014
IN
COMPANY PETITION No.298 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
Sonicwall BV-India Branch A Branch office of Sonicwall BV, A Company incorporated under the laws Of Netherlands and having its Place of business in Bangalore in the State of Karnataka.
… APPLICANT
(By Shri. Dhyan Chinnappa, Advocate for M/s. Crestlaw Partners)
AND:
Nil.
…RESPONDENT
This Company Application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying to condone the delay of three [3] days in filing the present petition, for the reasons stated therein.
2
This Company Application coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: -
O R D E R
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in filing the petition is condoned.
Sd/JUDGE
KS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of three days in filing the company petition under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 should be condoned.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sonicwall BV-India Branch
Nil
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
