The court allowed a company application requesting condonation of an 860-day delay in filing an appeal memo under Rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
Condonation of 860 days delay and allowance of the company application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
COMPANY APPLICATION No. 1303 OF 2013
IN
COMPANY PETITION No.166 OF 2001
BETWEEN:
Tukaramsa Badi, Dead by legal representatives
Both are resident of Harihar, Davanagere District.
… APPLICANTS
(By Shri. M.G. Contractor, Advocate)
AND:
The Official Liquidator, M/s. Mysore Kirloskar Limited
2
(in liquidation), Raheja Towers, 12th Floor, M.G.Road, Bangalore.
…RESPONDENT
(By Shri. K.S. Mahadevan, Advocate for Official Liquidator) *****
This Company Application is filed under Rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 5 of Limitation Act praying to condone the 860 days delay of filing in the above appeal memo by allowing this application.
This Company Application coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: -
O R D E R
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 860
days in filing the appeal memo is condoned. The application is
accordingly, allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tukaramsa Badi, Dead by legal representatives, P.B. Sanjeev Kumar, Vittalsa Badi
The Official Liquidator, M/s. Mysore Kirloskar Limited
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
