Disposed

Hasiru Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakari Niymaita v. the Cooperative Election Commissioner

Karnataka HC24 Sept 2013WP/82827/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 directing the Cooperative Election Commissioner and Deputy Registrar to consider a representation requesting appointment of an election officer and holding elections for a cooperative society. The court directed the respondent to consider the representation and disposed of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 2 to consider petitioners' representation dated 04.09.2013 for appointment of election officer and holding elections.

Hasiru Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakari Niymaita Vs the… — Election Law | Karnataka HC (2013)

¶1

: 1 :

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶3

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS

¶6

WRIT PETITION Nos. 82827-82831/2013 AND

¶7

WRIT PETITION Nos. 82840-82844/2013 (CS-EL-M)

¶8

BETWEEN :

¶9

Sri. HASIRU VIVIDHODDESHA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA MAMLE DESAI HIGH SCHOOL ROAD SHIGGAON – 581 205 (DIST.HAVERI) REP. BY ITS SECRETARY NINGANAGOUDA CHANNAVEERAGOUDA HOSAMANI, AGE 52 YEARS.

¶10

Sri. VIRUPAKSHAGOUDA S/O. VEERANAGOUDA PATIL AGE 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE POST HANUMANAHALLI TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI.

¶11

Sri. CHANNAPPA S/O. CHANNABASAPPA GUDLI AGE 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE POST HIREBENDIGERI TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI.

¶12

: 2 :

¶13

Dr. KUMARGOUDA S/O.HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL AGE 32 YEARS, OCC.DOCTOR SAVANUR ROAD, SHIGGAON TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI. 5. Sri. SHASHIDHAR S/O. SHIVAPUTRAPPA SURAGIMATH AGE 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS BUS STAND ROAD, SHIGGAON TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI. 6. Sri. LAXMANA S/O. GANGAPPA KUNDAGOL AGE 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS NEAR RASHMI THEATRE SHIGGAON TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI. 7. Sri. SHIVANAND S/O. CHANNAPPA JOLAD AGE 51 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE POST MOTALLI TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI.

¶14

Sri. RAJASHEKHAR S/O. BASAVARAJ ATTIGERI AGE 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE POST HULAGUR TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI.

¶15

: 3 :

¶16

Sri. GOVINDAPPA S/O. VENKAPPA MELAGIRI AGE 65 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS POST BANKAPUR TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI. 10. Smt. RENIKA S/O. NINGANAGOUDA HOSAMANI AGE 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE POST SHIGGAON TQ. SHIGGAON DIST. HAVERI. … PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY Sri. ANOOP G DESHPANDE, ADV.)

¶18

AND :

¶19

THE COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA STATE COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, No.3, 2^ND FLOOR KARIYAPPA ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE.

¶20

DIST. COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HAVERI DIST., HAVERI.

¶21

KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA FEDERAL COOPERATIVE LTD., NIRMANA BHAVANA Dr. RAJKUMAR ROAD RAJAJINAGAR

¶22

: 4 :

¶23

BANGALORE – 560 010 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. … RESPONDENTS

¶24

THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT Nos. 1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.09.2013 AND ETC.

¶25

THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

In these writ petitions the petitioners have prayed for a writ of

¶28

mandamus directing respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider their representation – Annexure E dated 04.09.2013. In this representation the petitioners requested respondent No. 2 to appoint an election officer and to hold election to respondent No. 3 cooperative society.

¶29

No prejudice will be caused to respondent No. 2 if he is directed to consider the petitioner’s representation Annexure E dated 04.09.2013 in accordance with law forthwith. Accordingly, the writ petitions are hereby disposed off.

¶30

SD/JUDGE

¶31

Lrs.

Hasiru Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakari Niymaita v. the Cooperative Election Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasiru Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakari Niymaita v. the Cooperative Election Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veerappa Shankarappa Sajjannav Vs the Dy Commr for Transports Be

Shivappa Muniyappa Pathroti Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Hasanmiya S/O Mahammad Sab Badiger Vs Somayya Karnool

Omkara Reddy S/O. G.S. Gurumurty @ Venkatesh Reddy Vs the Branch Manager

Devappa S/O. Ningappa Amatur Vs the State of Karnataka

Mallappa Yallappa Hubballi, Vs the Tahashildar