The judgment text is completely unintelligible due to severe text encoding failure (OCR noise/garbled characters), rendering the content unreadable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
������������������������������
������������������������
������������������� ����������������������
������
�������������������������������������������
����������������� � !"�����#���$���%
�������&
�'(')+,'--'����')'.'/� �"���/��'('.'/'0��')'.'/� �,12�'3�45����61'/(� �"���'.'))���4--'2'��4/'7'55� �'.')',4+2��')48� �7'/9'2��(5/:5�
;��155�+1/
#�6��/��'57(7��������2.�:'51%
���&
�� �71��+*.1/(*56��<��,/*:4)54/')��:*1+:1(� �'*:74/���1-/1(1+512�36�*5(��1,*(5/'/� �*+�:�21$!=>�����
�� �71���.1/+?1+5��<��'/+'5'8'� �6�5(��/+:-')��1:/15'/6� �1-'/5?1+5��<��,71/��24:'5*�+� �'/+'5'8'���.1/+?1+5��1:/15'/'5� !57 ��)��/�������4)2*+,�
�'+,')�/1�@�! ������ ���;��1(-�+21+5(
#�6��/������'5)���2.�:'51�<�/��$��
�/���A��'./'0������<�/��$�%
�7*(�9/5�-155*�+�(�<)12�4+21/��/5*:)1(��� �'+2���B��<�571 ��+(5545�+��<��+2*'�-/'6*+,�5��2*/1:5�571�/1(-�+21+5(�5��'2?5 571�-155*�+1/�+�571��1-'/5?1+5��<��,/:4)54/')��C51+(*�+
2
�24:'5*�+�<�/�571�':'21?:�61'/�����$�����36�-1/?55+,�571 -155*�+1/�5��-'6�571�/1D4*(*51�<11�'+2�15:�
�7*(�9/5�-155*�+�:�?+,��+�<�/�-/1)?+'/6�71'/+,�+�E�� ,/�4-�57(�2'6��571���4/5�?'21�571�<�))�9*+,&
���������
�71�-155�+1/�(�(21�7'(�<)12�'�?1?��(118*+,�)1'.1��<�571
��4/5�5��9572/'9�57(�-155�+���71�?1?��*(�5'81+��+�/1:�/2�
�7*(�-155�+�(�2(?((12�'(�9572/'9+�
����
�����
MD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court