In a writ petition invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought delivery of an original sale deed. The petitioner's counsel filed a memo representing dismissal; the Court recorded the application and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Dismissal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S ABDUL NAZEER
WRIT PETITION NO.5377/2013 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI P MUKUNDAN S/O SRI G PARTHASARATHY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDENCY APARTMENTS NO.19/10, BAWA ROAD ALWARPET CHENNAI-6000018
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.S.RAJADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
GOPAL, 237/46A, 5TH MAIN CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560004
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDETNS TO DELIVER TO THE PETITIONER THE ORIGINAL OF ANN-Q, VIZ, SALE DEED DT.11.12.1986 REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT BEARING NO.5323 AT PAGES NO.43-48/1986-87 IN BOOK-1 VOL-2516 IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUB-REGISTRAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner files a memo requesting this Court to dismiss the Writ Petition.
3
accordingly. No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Prs*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition praying for delivery of original sale deed should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri P Mukundan S/O Sri G Parthasarathy
Smt Radhika Vasudevan
Smt Padmini Narayan
Sri P Murlidhar
Smt Sangeeth Ravikanth
Smt Indira Parthasarathy
S. Abdul Nazeer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
