Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to quash orders passed by revenue authorities. On the date of the hearing, the petitioner's counsel filed a memo to withdraw the petition.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY
WRIT PETITION No.48267/2012(KLR-RR-SW)
BETWEEN :
THAMANNA S/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O KAVARANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK AND DIST.
...PETITIONER
( BY SRI. M JAIPRAKASH REDDY, ADV )
AND :
2
R/O IDDERAHALLI VILLAGE GUDIBANDA TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
( BY SRI. R.B. SATHYANARAYANA SINGH, HCGP FOR R1-3 AND 7 ) (VAKALATH NOT FILED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.2.3.09, PASSED BY THE R3 VIDE ANN-B & THE ORDER DT.28.3.12, VIDE ANN-C PASSED BY THE R2 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to withdraw the petition.
3
Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly.
JUDGE
Rms
THAMANNA
STATE OF KARNATAKA
NARAYANA SWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
