Writ petition filed seeking quashing of a communication. The petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS
WRIT PETITION No. 45328/2011 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN :
A S T ARASU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O. A M SEEYALAM No. 35/B, 2ND CROSS 60 FEET ROAD MAHAGANAPATHINAGARA RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE – 560 010.
… PETITIONER
(By Sri. PUTTIGE R RAMESH, ADV.)
AND :
BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA Dr. B R A ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001.
2
3
(By Sri. K A ARIGA, AGA, FOR R-1 TO 7 M/S. KING & PARTRIDGE, ADVS., FOR R-8)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATINO DATED 11.06.2009 ISSUED BY R-6 AS AT ANNEXURE B AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING;
4
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking
withdrawal of the writ petition.
petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE.
LRS.
Astarasu
State of Karnataka
H.N. Nagamohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
