also the modified approved plan. It is pointed out that from the very case of the petitioners, it is clear that the Society had in fact formed the layout in the survey numbers denoted in the petition which does not include Sy.No.63 of Nagarabhavi village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk which in fact was acquired for the benefit of the respondent for forming a housing layout therein. In that circumstance, it is contended that when the society did not have any right whatsoever over the property bearing Sy.No.63, if any allotments were made by the Society to any of its members in that land, not only the said allotments would not be valid, but would not also not bind the respondent herein merely because the Society has thereafter secured the modified plan and excluded the area from their earlier plan and the sites are now in the layout of the respondent. In that circumstance, it is contended that even if the representation as made by the petitioners is considered, no relief could be granted to the petitioner by the respondent since they have sought for allotment of sites in the layout belonging to the respondent which can only be
