Disposed

M/S Unishire Skyscapes LLP v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC22 Apr 2013WP/1807/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka, considering the issues raised in the instant writ petitions were similar to those in W.P.No.40/2013, disposed of the petitions in identical terms and directed the registry to issue the operative portion of the earlier order.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of in similar terms to W.P.No.40/2013; registry directed to issue operative portion of W.P.No.40/2013.

M/S Unishire Skyscapes LLP Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2013

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA

¶5

WRIT PETITION NOs.1807/2013 & 2714-2716/2013 (LB-BMP)

¶6

BETWEEN :

¶7

1 M/S UNISHIRE SKYSCAPES LLP BEING A REGISTERED PARTNERSHI FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT 2008 HAVIG ITS OFFICE AT NO.6, KASTURI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, KUMARA PARK-WEST, BANGALORE REPTD. BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER PRATIK MEHTA

¶8

2 MR. B.K. SRINIVAS MURTHY S/O LATE P. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED 50 YEARS

¶9

3 MR. B.K. PRAKASH S/O LATE P. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED 41 YEARS

¶10

NOS.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT NO.51, T.D. LANE, COTTONPET, BANGLORE-53.

¶11

4 MRS. B.K. LALITHA D/O LATE P. KRISHNA MURTHY W/O DR. NARAYANASWAMY AGED 47 YEARS R/A NO.159, GEETHANJALI LAYOUT, HAL 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-75.

¶12

¶13

PETITIONER NOS.2 , 3 AND 4 ARE REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY THE FIRST PETITIONER.

¶14

...PETITIONERS

¶15

( By Sri. MALLA REDDY B V, ADV. )

¶16

AND :

¶17

1 STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-1.

¶18

2 THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-2.

¶19

3 THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BYATARAYANAPURA SUB DIVISION, YELAHANKA ZONE, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE-45. ...RESPONDENTS

¶20

( By Sri.N B VISHWANATH, AGA FOR R-1; SRI.K.N.PUTTEGOWDA, ADV. FPR R-2 & 3 )

¶21

THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DT.23.12.09, VIDE ANN-H PASSED BY THE R1 & CONSEQUENTLY THE CIRCULAR DT.7.2.11 VIDE ANN-E1, ISSUED BY THE R2 & THE DEMAND NOTICE DT.31.12.12, VIDE ANN-D, ISSUED BY THE R3, ETC.

¶22

THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The issues raised in the instant petitions are similar to

¶25

the issues, which have been considered by this Court while disposing of W.P.No.40/2013 and connected petitions

¶26

¶27

disposed of on 10.04.2013. Hence, for the reasons assigned in the said order, the instant petitions are also disposed of in similar terms. The operative portion of the order passed in W.P. No.40/2013 and connected petitions shall apply as direction in the instant petition as well. Hence, Registry to issue the operative portion of the order in W.P.No.40/2013 along with a certified copy of this order to the petitioner.

¶28

In terms of the above, the petitions stand disposed of.

¶29

SD/JUDGE

¶30

KNM/-

M/S Unishire Skyscapes LLP v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Unishire Skyscapes LLP v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Jyothi Mallikarjun Vs the Urban Development Department

Smt N G Nirmala Vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike

U P Venkatesh Aithal Vs the Chief Officer

Sri Muniyappa Vs the Urban Development Department

Sri B Nagesh Vs the Chief Secretary

Smt. Shanthakumari Vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike