G Shambhavi Rao v. Gulabi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a regular second appeal as not maintainable because one of the respondents, the contesting defendant in the suit, had died.
What the court decided
1 RSA No.833/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. PACHHAPURE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.833 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
SMT.G SHAMBHAVI RAO W/O LATE SRI RATNAKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT “VEENA COTTAGE” MAROLI KAIKAMBA KULSHEKAR POST MANGALORE-575 004.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI: LOKESH MALAVALLI, ADV)
AND:
- MRS.GULABI AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT KALIKAMBA TEMPLE CAR STREET MANGALORE-575 003.
- SRI. KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS HOSAGADDE, PILAR THOKKOTTU, ULLAL MANGALORE-575 004.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 ORDER XLI, RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.11.2009 PASSED IN RA NO.724/2004
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt.G Shambhavi Rao
- respondent
Mrs. Gulabi
- respondent
Sri. Krishna
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/833/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court