In this plaintiff's second appeal against a judgment and decree, the Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court held that no substantial question of law arose. The appeal was dismissed as there was no ground to admit it, with findings being concurrent with lower courts.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R.S.A.No.364/2011
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
R.S.A.No.364/2011
BETWEEN:
K.G.UMASHANKAR S/O LATE CHIKKA GANGADHARAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/OF KAKOLU VILLAGE HESARAGATTA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK PIN CODE-560 064 … APPELLANT
(BY SRI KRISHNA MOORTHY. D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SIDDARAMAIAH
SINCE DEAD BY L.Rs
R.S.A.No.364/2011
-2-
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 064
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE-560 064
KEREKODI CIRCLE, TIPTUR
TUMKUR DISTRICT-560 008
HESARAGHATTA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 064
(BY SRI P.P.HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6; SRI GOPAL SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR R9; M/S H.J.ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR M/S LAW INC., ADVOCATES FOR R8; R-7 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 7.8.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.116/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-II, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.9.2008
R.S.A.No.364/2011
-3-
PASSED IN O.S.NO.612/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. II CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant. This is a plaintiff’s second appeal. Judgment of the trial Court is confirmed by the lower appellate Court. Concurrent findings by both the Courts. In my opinion, no substantial question of law arises for determination in this second appeal. No ground to admit the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Yn.
K.G. UMASHANKAR
GANGAMMA AND OTHERS
H.G. RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
