The High Court of Karnataka heard a regular second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC. The appeal was dismissed as settled out of court based on the appellant's memo submitted to the court.
The appeal was dismissed as settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 RSA No.2921/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. PACHHAPURE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2921 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
SRI P JAGADEESH S/O E S PADMANABHA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.362-H, 9TH J MAIN ROAD R P C LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560 040.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI: PRABHAKAR L SHETTY, ADV)
AND:
APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.13/22B LAKSHMIPURA EXTENSION ARSIKERE TOWN, ARSIKERE TALUK-573 103.
RSA No.2921/2010
2
... RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.09.2010 PASSED IN RA NO.29/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, HASSAN, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.02.2008 PASSED IN OS NO.59/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) & ADDL. CJM, ARSIKERE.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Heard.
Perused the memo. Counsel for the
appellant has sought for dismissal of this appeal as settled out of Court.
3 RSA No.2921/2010
In view of the memo filed and the
submission made, the appeal is dismissed as
settled out of Court.
Sd/JUDGE
*bgn/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri P Jagadeesh
Sri E S Padmanabha
Smt Vanajakshamma
Sri P Ramesh
Smt P Nagarathna
Smt P Shobha
A.S. Pachhapure
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
