Judgment dismissed for non-prosecution where appellant failed to appear and comply with office objections despite granted time. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2401/2011 (DEC & P.INJ).
Between: Mahadevappa, S/o Kattannamma, Aged about 51 years, r/a Hadinaru Village, Chatra Hobli, Nanjanagud Tq., Mysore Dist. …. Appellant.
(By Sri N.D.Nanjappa, Adv. - ABSENT)
And : Goolaiah, S/o Goddalehundi Goolappa, R/a Hadinaru Village, Chatra Hobli, Nanjanagud Taluk, Mysore Dist. …. Respondent.
This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Sec.100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 1.9.2009 in R.A.No.7/2006 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at Nanjanagudu, etc.
2
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Despite grant of sufficient time, the appellant has not
complied with the office objections. None appears for the appellant.
costs.
Sd/JUDGE.
BMM/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahadevappa
Goolaiah
S. Abdul Nazeer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
