Sri N R Channaveera Shetty v. Sri R Rajanna
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal was listed for orders. Four weeks time was granted to file paper books. Due to non-filing and non-compliance with office objections, the appeal stood dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS5TH DAY OF JULY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’ F3LE MR. JUSTICE AN.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO 567 OF 2008
BETWEEN
SRI N R CHANNAVEERA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SIDDAGANGA EXTENSION TUMKUR - 572 102. APPELLANT. S/O LATE RUDRAIAH OPPTO S.L.N BAKERY R/A I CROSS,
(By Sri. G. S. RAJASHEKHAR, SRI.G DEVARAJ, SRI. RAMESH GOUDA, SRI. M. J. SUMANTH, ADV. FOR M/S. DEVARAJ ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES)
AND
- SRI R RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEAS NEW BUILDING, ANNASANDRAPALYA H.A.L POST BANGALORE- 17 S/O LATE R RUDRAIAR R/A CHINNAPPA RED COMPOUND
2, SRI. N R JAGADEESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 02. S/O LATE R RUDRAIAH R/A NARASANDRA
RFA.No,567/08
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC should be allowed or dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri N R Channaveera Shetty
- respondent
Sri R Rajanna
- respondent
Sri N R Jagadeesh
- respondent
N R Sachidananda Murthy
- respondent
N R Shimudrusht
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/567/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court