The Additional Civil Judge was the trial court. The appellants filed a Memo stating the appeal was not pressed. The High Court dismissed the appeal accordingly and ordered the refund of court fee.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed. The appellants were ordered a refund of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
RFA.3016/2009 (S. P.)
BETWEEN:
(By Sri H. R. Bentur, Adv.)
AND:
2
(By Sri.V.M. Sheelavant, Adv. R.1 & R.2)
This MFA is filed under Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC, praying to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Sr.Division, Hospet, in O.S.No.167/2007 dated 19.11.2008 and etc.
This MFA coming on for Orders this day, the court., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Appellants’ Counsel has filed a Memo stating that the
appellants does not press the appeal.
Office to refund the full court fee to the appellants after
due verification.
SD/JUDGE
Sub/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Babulal
K. Mahendra Kumar
H. Raghunath Shetty
Smt.H. Hemavathi Shetty
B.V. Nagarathna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
