Disposed

Shri Puttaramaiah S/O Shri Gangaiah v. the Divisional Manager

Karnataka HC18 Jan 2013MFA/8301/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bangalore Lok Adalat, hearing a miscellaneous appeal in a motor accident claim, recorded a settlement between the appellant driver and the insurance company to enhance compensation to Rs. 30,000 in full and final settlement.

What did the court decide?

Appeal settled on enhancement of compensation to Rs. 30,000 to be deposited within six weeks with 9% p.a. interest on default.

Shri Puttaramaiah S/O Shri Gangaiah Vs the Divisional Manager — Karnataka HC (2013) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE

¶2

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA AND

¶7

SRI. N.S.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH, MEMBER

¶8

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.8301/2009 Lok Adalat No.773/2012

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

560 075. R/at No.6, Sri Ram Nagar, S/o.Shri.Gangaiah, Kamakshipalya. Bangalore Shri. Puttaramaiah, Aged about 54 years.

¶11

Appellant

¶12

(By Sri.Shripad V.Shastri & K.V.Naik, Advocates)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Bangalore The Divisional Manager, B.M.T.C., K.H.Road. — 27.

¶15

No.19-19/i. South End Road, United India Insurance Co.Ltd., 2. The Divisional Manager,

¶16

2’ Floor, Basavanagudi,

¶17

Bangalore- 560 004.

¶18

Respondents

¶19

(By Sri. Puttige R.Ramesh, Advocate for R-2)

¶20

FOR COMPENSATION AND THIS MFI\ FILET) IJ/S.173 (1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. AWARI) DATED 20-O42O09 PASSED IN MVC NO.6522/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PARTLY ALLOWENG THE CLAIM PETITION XII ADDL. JUDGE. COURT OF SMALL CAUSES & MEMBER, MACT. BANGALORE.

¶21

¶22

REFERRED VIDE ORDER 04-01-2013, THE THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER DATEI) FOLLOWING BEING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED:

¶23

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶24

parties the matter. The learned counsel for the appellant has agreed to receive the have agreed settle Company has agreed to pay the same. a global compensation of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand After negotiations, to only). in addition to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. The respondent — Insurance

¶25

amount Insurance Company within a period of six weeks from the date of shall deposited the the date of default, till the date of deposit. by receipt of copy of this order. If the amount is not deposited within be The of Rs.30,000/6 weeks, the same shall carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from

¶26

be released in favour of the appellant. On deposit. the entire enhanced compensation amount shall

¶27

Insurance settling the matter appreciated and placed on record. Company The efforts put in by the learned counsel for the parties and officers of the in is 4.

¶28

¶29

In terms of the above, the matter is settled.

¶30

JUDG

¶31

Shri Puttaramaiah S/O Shri Gangaiah v. the Divisional Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Puttaramaiah S/O Shri Gangaiah v. the Divisional Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhruba Shankar Talukdar Vs Dheeshjith

Abdul Jabbar Vs K Jainuddin

Nagesha Vs Swamygowda

Smt Rathnamma Vs M K Babaria, the Proprietor

Master Arun Vs C S Chandrappa

Anjiniyappa Vs a Krishnappa