Dismissed

Smt Neela v. Sri H C Chaluvaraju

Karnataka HC1 Feb 2013MFA/4587/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Lok Adalat dismissed a Miscellaneous First Appeal challenging a Motor Vehicles Trial Court Award. The court ordered a settlement where the insurance company pays Rs. 15,000 plus original award, with interest on delayed payment, modifying the original Tribunal award accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Insurance company to pay Rs. 15,000 plus original award within six weeks with 9% p.a. interest on default; original Award modified.

Smt Neela Vs Sri H C Chaluvaraju — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2013)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶3

DATED THIS THE 01st DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013

¶4

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶5

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

¶6

¶7

SRI. K.M.NATARAJ, MEMBER

¶8

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.4587/20 10

¶9

(Loic Adalat No.827/2012)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Smt. Neela W/o.Gopalachari, Aged about 24 years, R/o. Gollahaili, Chachuvalli Post, Magadi Main Road. 3^id Stage. Bangalore.

¶12

Appellant

¶13

(By Sri.N.M.Handral, Advocate)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Sri.H.C.Chaluvaraju. No.200,^3rd Stage, 4th Cross. 4th Block, West of Chord Road, Bangalore.

¶16

The Manager, United India Insurance Co.Ltd., No.21, St.Patricks Bldng., Museum Road, Bangalore - 25. Respondents

¶17

(By Sri. Jwala Kumar, Advocates for R-2)

¶18

MFA FILET) T7S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST ThE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24 11 2009 PASSED IN MVC NO.7804/2008 ON ThE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE. PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. TillS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIAITION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AYFER BEING REFERRED VIDE ORDER DTD.30-1 1-2012. ThE FOLLOWING ORDER IS PASSED.

¶19

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶20

Insurance Company along with its representative are present. The learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for respondent

¶21

— Insurance the matter the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo prolonged negotiations, settled. Company has agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Appellant has agreed to receive and the respondent Fifteen Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by After is The is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect.

¶22

- Insurance Company has agreed to deposit ci eposit. the said amount before the Tribunal, within six weeks from the date of preparation of Award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at 9% p.a. from the date of default, till the date of The Respondent

¶23

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant. 4.

¶24

This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in terms of accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. 5. the Joint memo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand modified

¶25

Ii :3 J I

¶26

Smt Neela v. Sri H C Chaluvaraju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Neela v. Sri H C Chaluvaraju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahaboobsab S/O Fakrusab Nippani, Vs Mahaboobsab S/O Hotelsab Dharwad

Imam S/O Sabjan Sab, Vs Tyagarajan S/O Periyan Goundar

Kum.Namdev S/O Raju Patil, Vs the Divisional Manager

Shri Ramakrishna Vs Sri R Indresh

Sri. Ramanappa Vs N K Mathinullah

Vikas S/O Vinod Saini Vs the Manager