Appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal judgment was dismissed for default, as the appellant failed to comply with a notice requiring removal of office objections by 27.2.2013. No further orders were passed.
Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with directions to remove office objections within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.30804/2012 (MV)
BETWEEN:
Veena D/o. Mallayya Hiremath Age: 10 years Occ: Student M/G. Bhageerathi W/o. Mallayya Hiremath Aged about 40 years Occ: H.H. Work R/o. Near Mugulkod Math Bijapur …. APPELLANT
(By M/s. Chetana Assocites, Advs.)
AND:
2
Policy No.3004/A/51632704/00/000 Valid from 19.4.2007 to 18.4.2008 … RESPONDENTS
This appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, praying to modify the judgment and award dated 23.7.2011 in MVC No. 584/2008 on the file of the MACT XII, Bijapur, and etc.
This appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
On 13.2.2013, two weeks time was granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal would stand dismissed. The appeal stood dismissed on 27.2.2013, as the office objections have not been complied with by then. Therefore, no further orders are necessary.
Ordered accordingly. No costs.
Sd/JUDGE.
Cs/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second and third appeals were maintainable in law?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Veena D/o. Mallayya Hiremath
M/G. Bhageerathi W/o. Mallayya Hiremath
Renukabai W/o. Mahesh Arakerei
The Branch Manager I.C.I.C.I. Lombard Ins. Co. Ltd.
S. Abdul Nazeer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
