A single judge dismissed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. due to non-prosecution after multiple adjournments for failure of the petitioner's counsel to appear.
The criminal revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 211/2013
BETWEEN :
Sri. PURUSHOTHAM S/O. SANNAPPAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ACHANGI GRAMA SAKALESHAPURA TALUK HASSAN DIST. 573 201.
… PETITIONER
(By Sri. S S BHARATH, ADV.)
AND : -------
Sri. Y K DHARMARAJU S/O. LATE KARIGOWDA AGED 49 YEARS ACHANGI GRAMA & POST SAKALESHAPURA TALUK HASSAN DIST. 573 201.
… RESPONDENT
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374 (2) Cr.P.C. WITH A PRAYER TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.11.2012 PASSED BY THE PRL. S.J., HASSAN, IN CRL.A. No. 55/2010 AND ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING;
O R D E R
This is the fourth time the matter is appearing before the Court for non-compliance of office objections. When the matter was called in the first round there was no representation and the matter was passed over enabling learned counsel for the petitioner to comply the office objections. In the post lunch session when the matter is called there is no representation. Accordingly, the petition
is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE.
LRS.
Purushotham S/O. Sannappagowda
Y K Dharmaraju
H.N. Nagamohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
